Public Deserves Transparency in County Inventory Issues

Health Department Loses Equipment, Obfuscates, Evades Questions, and Spreads Untruths About Inquiries.  More Questions Still Linger About Plenty of Missing County Equipment.
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  April 3, 2012 

Overview:  After having learned that the County Inventory Clerk filed a complaint in Sept 2011 with the Office of the State Attorney, citing being pressured to resign over finding $250,000 in missing equipment at the Health Department, I initiated an inquiry to find out more.  I wrote about it here on Naked Conch, and as well in KONK Life newspaper.

Ultimately what transpired was that as a result of my inquiries, I seemed to have alienated Bob Eadie, the Director of the Monroe County Health Department, whereby he eventually suggested that my assertions and line of questioning was "false and without foundation."  I stand by every word I wrote, and support every valid question with documentation contained below.  Mr. Eadie then went on Guy deBoer's show and made comments that were patently false and misleading, to which I respond throughout the five video segments below recorded on my show on the KONK Broadcasting Network which aired on March 30.

Bottom Line:  In this day of countless scandals, any public agency needs to strive to be as transparent as possible and responsive to the public, especially if they have a repetitively problematic track record. 

The facts are this:

The Inventory Clerk for Monroe County did file a complaint with the Office of the State Attorney in Sept 2011 suggesting he was being pressured to resign as a result of  "the Health Department is short of $250K of missing computers."  That complaint can be viewed here. 

I did receive a document from the Clerk's office as a result of a public records request that contained some very questionable items.  (Full document here.)  This document contained a letter (Found here.) from Mr. Eadie to the Clerk's Office in 2009 explaining the improper disposal of over $227,000 of equipment, along with an accompanying list of deletion requests (Found here.) signed by Mr. Eadie to account for the missing inventory and zero the books.  While I have admitted that most of that list looks obsolete, remember that that is at the time of it being administratively accounted for as missing with the deletion requests.  No one knows when it went missing.  In addition, the list does contain some items from 2006.

In his 2009 letter, Mr. Eadie assures the Clerk's Office that "We have adopted procedures that will prevent the disposition on public assets without proper authorization."

The very next year, in an email exchange (Found here.) between the Health Department's Andrew Bulla, and the Inventory Clerk Mitch Hedman, Bulla writes that "the majority of the MC tagged assets have not been found."  Also, at the very top of that page, Mary Vanden Brook seems to have made an odd statement of  "One suggestion: add the present value as zero or close to it."

Other unusual items contained within the Clerk's response were, a 2010 list of $29K of items "missing 2 years," (Found here.) and a very long list over countless pages of valuable inventory under a heading of "Need Destruction Form." (Found here.)  This list is HUGE!

I found all of this to be very unusual, so I made a Public Records Request (Found here.) of the Health Department for the following;
 1 - The Monroe County Health Department's copy of the last three years of Monroe County Inventory Reports for the Monroe County Health Department as prepared by Mitch Hedman, or any record reflecting an accounting of Monroe County Inventory of equipment or assets assigned to the Health Department maintained b or provided to your agency for the last three years.
2 - Any email exchange between Andrew Bulla, Mary Vanden Brook, Brian Blair, Mitch Hedman and/or yourself during the month of July 2010 that contained the words "Missing MCHD Assets" in the subject line.
3 - Any record maintained by the Health Department that reflects or discusses missing County assets or
inventory, and/or a copy of any policy or procedure developed by the Health department to track Monroe County Assets.

Health Department Administrative Director Mary Vanden Brook responded by offering to provide a response to the Public Records request at a cost of over $400 including charges for her time as well as Mr. Eadie's time.  (The entire email exchange can be found here.)  Throughout the email exchange you can read that along with objecting to the cost of providing a response, in an effort to be more concise, I also offer more detailed options such as;

"How much would it cost for a copy of the last three years of County inventory records that your office may have?"

"it would be nice to view the entire email conversation that is only partially copied in the PRR from the Clerk, where Andrew Bulla suggests he can't find the majority of tagged assets"

"It would also be nice to review any policy you implemented as a result of your letter of 2009"

Mr. Eadie did provide me a copy of another deletion request from July of 2010 for approximately $29K worth of equipment filed only after it went missing that seems to correlate with the "missing 2 years" list.  This list did however contain over $10,000 of relatively new equipment that was misplaced and that to my knowledge was never reported to the police, nor covered by insurance.  

After failing to respond to my more simplified requests, calling me irresponsible, suggesting my accusation had no basis in fact, Mr. Eadie then became irate after my article discussing the above topic was published in KONK Life.  Guy deBoer gave Mr. Eadie the opportunity to come on his show.  

On this show, Mr. Eadie states the following untruths;

Untruth #1- He had never heard of any inventory issues until I brought them to his attention. FACT: His signature is on over $227,000 of deletion requests for equipment that was missing and/or improperly disposed.  He also had provided me with an ADDITIONAL list of $29K of missing equipment with Mary Vanden Brooks name on it.

Untruth #2- My public records request was for THREE YEARS of emails. FACT: It was originally for a search of only one month, between specific people, with a VERY defined subject line.  I revised it to be for ONLY ONE particular email exchange.

Untruth #3 - He would be willing to sit down and let me revise my request and make it more specific.  FACT: SEE ABOVE.  I already had, and he has yet to respond.

This coming from a guy who accused me of being without foundation.

Ultimately after all of his obfuscation he did provide me one tidbit of information that was helpful.  Apparently the questionable inventory BEYOND the missing $257,000 with his or Ms. Vanden Brook's signature, found listed in the Clerk's response on pages 14 and 15 as part of his inventory report under the heading "Need Destruction Form" was in fact not his equipment.

That begs the question, then whose equipment is all that?  To that end, I had already submitted a Public Records Request to the Clerk's Office for the inventory reports from the Fire Department, and the IT Department on March 12.  To follow up, I also sent a follow up to the Clerk's Office on March 24 to find out more. (Found here.) As of today, there has been no response whatsoever.  And on it goes....  

In Conclusion:  In light of all the scandals, and the fact the Inventory Clerk was compelled to file a complaint with the State Attorney last September, our public officials should be jumping at the opportunity to be as transparent as possible, not putting up road blocks, and spewing untruths about people making inquiries.  Enjoy the show below including Mr. Eadie's appearance on Guy deBoer's show!

Just the facts, mam, just the facts!

Part 1 - An Overview of the Issues

Part 2 - Let's Charge over $400 to provide you with a response to your public records request...including Bob Eadie's and Mary Vanden Brook's time...seriously?
 

Part 3 - Gardi adjusts his requests, Eadie sites an email that he doesn't provide, and a phone call that no one has a copy of as his "facts," and basis of his defense.


Part 4 - Bob Eadie appears on Guy deBoer's show....now it gets interesting.  Suggests he never heard of any issues, ignoring his signature on over $227,000 of inventory deletion requests for missing equipment he signed years before and an additional $29K list he provided to Gardi.  Let's check facts, shall we Mr. Eadie...


Part 5 - Eadie suggests Gardi asks for "THREE YEARS OF EMAILS!"  Absolutely 100% untrue, coming from a guy who has just accused Gardi of being without foundation!


Gastesi Suggests Sewer Deal Isn't So Smelly

State Will Cover Entire $50 Million Should Scott Approve Deal
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 29, 2012

Roman Gastesi was kind enough to spend some time recently at the Sugarloaf Homeowners Association, along with Monroe County Commissioner George Nuegent.  At the presentation before approximately fifty conerned citizens, Gastesi elaborated on the most recent sewer funding initiatives.

After having seen news coverage that the State's proposal may have only been intended to cover the first year of the proposed $50 Million dollar bond issue, which ultimately may have left Monroe County holding the bag, Gastesi assured residents that the entire bond issue will be backed by the State for the full duration.  The intention appears to be to use real estate doc filing fees to cover the subsequent years payments.

This was good news to many, whose concerns still centered around special assessments that will still need to be administered along with estimated sewage hook up fees.  However, the plan did seem feasible, with precautions being taken to allow for the project to back track should any funding source evaporate.

While there still seemed to be many potential pitfalls to the entire funding obligation, risk to County government exposure did appear to be minimized in the event of any set back such as voters not approving an extension of the dedicated sales tax. All eyes will be on Governor Scott who could strike the proposed $50 million bond issue from the budget in he coming days.

Campaign for Clerk Hitting High Gear

The campaign is beginning to move into high gear, as we have already enjoyed one forum with more to come soon!  Check out the video on the campaign website at www.mattgardi.com.

Also find out what people are asking, and read and/or watch Matt's responses! When possible, I will always include the responses from forums of my opponents as well.  ASK MATT a question yourself!
Check it out here!

Also, see what people who know Matt have to say about him!
Check it out here!

This campaign for Clerk of Courts is essential to each and every one of us, take the time to find out why by visiting my constantly updated website! I hope it provides you the information you need to make an informed decision when you cast your vote.
www.mattgardi.com





Mortgages Pledged to Multiple Trusts

More Evidence Exposing Banks Sold the Same Mortgage Numerous Times
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 20, 2012
Whether you are being foreclosed on, have just paid off your mortgage, purchased a property recently, or wonder why your pension fund is under funded, this ought to concern you greatly!  Gary Victor Dubin, a Hawaii Foreclosure Defense Attorney recently analyzed the contents of three WaMu Mortgage Loan Trusts.  These are the trusts that securitized mortgages are sold to.

Some mortgages appear to have been sold as many as SIX times!  You can read the full report "Securitized Distrust" by clicking here.  Of note is this little gem...
It’s no wonder that the Wall Street MBS scheme collapsed. Last night we ran a random audit on WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Mortgage Loan Trusts. One loan was found in 6 different trusts, another loan was found in FIVE trusts’ original SEC loan level data, 39 were listed in 3 trusts, and 503 were listed in two separate trusts.

The winner so far is a NEW YORK condo, loan number WaMu loan # 714934858, appeared in 6 DIFFERENT trusts from May through November 2006…
Folks, I have discussed frequently the reason Banks have had to flood our Clerk's Office and land records with fraudulent documents to prove they own a mortgage.  It is because they defrauded investors when they securitized the mortgages and destroyed any record of them... including the original notes and mortgages.

This effects everyone.
 - If you just paid off your mortgage and feel happy about that Satisfaction of Mortgage that is on file, you may just find another investor coming out of the mess with a claim you still owe them the mortgage.

 - If you just bought a property, and think you have title clean and free, you just may find out there is a lingering mortgage or two...or six, hanging over your head!

 - If you are being foreclosed on, you might just be losing your house to the very same entity that defrauded your pension fund with Mortgage Backed Securities that contain multiple pledged mortgages!

 - If you have just watched your home value plummet as a result of diminishing confidence in title histories, ultimately effecting our tax base, and the revenue of every public agency in the Keys, you can thank the banks!


This isn't just an anomaly, this is wide spread, systematic fraud.  We are all victims.


This Friday on the Naked Conch Hour - Attorney Maggie Gutierrez


Joining me this week, Friday, March 23 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Attorney Maggie Gutierrez, HARC Commissioner, Secretary of the Monroe County Bar Association and former Assistant Public Defender, (www.mykeywestlawyer.com) on board to discuss a host of issues, from current HARC items, to mortgage fraud, and foreclosure defense.  Hopefully we will have some time to cover other topics such as indigence status, and the vital role the Public Defender plays in our community, and how best to provide public resources to support the mission.  Tune in!


Watch live on Naked Conch
or

Does the State Sewer Deal Stink?

Arrangement Might Leave County Holding the Bag
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 15, 2012

Lost in all the hopeful rhetoric surrounding this year's anticipated sewer funding that has left so many local officials patting each other on the back is the discussion of what happens...next year.

To my understanding, those numerous officials who brought their entourages up to Tallahassee recently to do what I frequently refer to as the Tallahassee Two Step, are celebrating the fact the State is willing to pony up the first year's funding of a $50 million dollar bond issue.  As Ryan McCarthy of the Keynoter recently reported, the Legislature has included $4.8 Million to fund the first year of the bond issue in this year's budget.

So, while all our local officials are elated, and feel vindicated that the expense of sending so many folks up to Tallahassee for the final crunch of the budget process was not just a glorified trip to hold hands and sing Kumbayah, I am left wondering where will we stand next year at this time.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for exploring every alternative to fund the completion of the sewer projects, but I have always maintained that perhaps we should not be so idealistic, and we, along with the State need to extend the mandated time frame for completion again.  That timeline needs to be stretched at least until funding is available on a pay as you go basis from the State, not by incurring more debt.

While the State is ponying up $4.8 million this year, I want to know what happens when our entourage of elated local deal makers come back empty handed next year.  What happens after they travel to Tallahassee, and spend days using the latest app on their iPad to locate restaurants to dine with other important deal makers in a frenzy of self aggrandizement and then the State says no to additional sewer bond funding??

Guess who is on the hook for the rest of the $50 Million dollar bond issue?  Yeah, you guessed it, you and me.  Ever wonder how those things happen that result in some government official saying, "We couldn't have seen this coming, we need to look forward, deals we made in the past are water under the bridge."

Ultimately, locally we may be stuck with an ongoing need to fund this $50 million dollar bond issue to the tune of $5 Million per year.  That's when you'll hear about all the dire cuts that will need to be made to essential County services unless we implement some new creative tax, like expanding the gas tax, or a toll booth on US 1, on increasing the sales tax, and on and on and on.

     

Naked Conch Scoops Key West Citizen by...TWO MONTHS?!?!

NC Covered Schools Outstanding Half Million to FEMA in January!
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 6, 2012


The Key West Citizen rolled out an article today covering the fact that the Monroe County School District owes FEMA almost a half million dollars as a result of over funding they received for hurricane Georges clean-up.
This just goes to prove that Naked Conch is your one stop source for up to the minute breaking news, we covered that here on our blog, ohhh, sometime around January 10!!!


I guess we can expect to see some coverage by the Citizen of the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars of missing inventory at the Health Department, and questionable oversight at the Clerk's Office we have been covering here at Naked Conch... sometime in May?!?!  We look forward to it! 

County Inventory Investigation Needs Expansion

Results of Public Records Request Raise More Questions
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 3, 2012
It was refreshing to see the effect of this blog.  Only minutes after I posted a blog entry here on Naked Conch about my unanswered public records requests dealing with County inventory issues, I received a response from the Clerk's office.  Unfortunately the response only raised more questions.

What I received was a PDF document which included a variety of documents in response to my request for "The last two years of Monroe County Inventory Reports for the Monroe County Health Department as prepared by Mitch Hedman."  If you recall, Hedman is the former County employee in charge of inventory.  He filed a complaint with the State Attorney's Office in Sept 2011 suggesting he was being asked to resign after discovering $250,000 in missing inventory at the Health Department.  It is important to note that the inventories Hedman tracked were comprised of items over $1,000, not the iPhone and iPads that are at the center of the latest inventory scandal, which are below the value level to be tracked by the County.

To review the entire document I received click here.  To say it is a bit confusing is an understatement, but let's take note of the most significant items contained within.  Page 20 is an email dated October 6, 2009 from Bob Eadie, Administrator of the Monroe County Health Department, to Kevin Madok, Hedman's direct supervisor at the Clerk's office.  In this email,  Eadie explains how tens of thousands of dollars worth of equipment may have been improperly disposed of, and that he is requesting authorization to dispose of them as assets after the fact.  He assures Madok that...
We have adopted procedures that will prevent the disposition on public assets without proper authorization.
To be fair, most of the equipment seemed very old and worthless, (at least at the time it was discovered unaccounted for) and Eadie provided a document illustrating that a large quantity of equipment had been recycled the year before.  Regardless, things should be good going forward, right?

Check out Page 12.  Less than a year later on July 19, 2010, Andrew Bulla, Office Operations of the Monroe County Health Departments, emails Mitch Hedman and states...
As we discussed after a thorough search of our facilities from Key Largo to Key West a few MC tagged assets did turn up However the majority of the MC tagged assets have not been found.
Wow.  The majority of tagged assets??  But Bulla goes on to comfort Hedman.
After these missing assets are deleted from the inventory records future MCHD asset audits should prove exemplary.
Didn't we just hear that the year prior?  Once we just fill out some paperwork on all this missing stuff, we should be able to maintain a better accounting of whatever is left. This time the equipment appears to be valuable, useful and extensive.  This email gives complete credence to Hedman's concerns about the Health Department's inventory.  You would think that two years in a row of massive amounts of missing inventory might be cause for concern.  Also of note on this page was what seems to be an oddly compiled email exchange that seems to paint the picture Hedman was OK with this, which he wasn't.  Please note, Bulla's email is dated July 19, 2010 with a subject of  "RE: Missing MCHD Assets."  This email is pasted directly above one from Hedman as if Hedman was replying to Bulla.  But Hedman's is dated July 15, 2010 and has a subject of  "RE: from Andrew."  The tech guy in me thinks that it might be difficult to reply to an email that won't arrive until four days into the future.

One wonders what the need was to paste such emails together to create such an impression.  Also note the strange quote at the very top of the page from Mary Vanden Brook which says, "One suggestion: add the present value as zero or close to it."  


Page 12 is so strange, I include it here by itself for your review.



As I mentioned, more questions than answers.  Add to that, Page 11, which appears to be a 2010 inventory close.  Apparently, by August 5, 2010 there was only a small $29,258.12 worth of inventory unaccounted for over the past two years.  Does this include the "majority of tagged assets" that weren't found, and had a deletion request at the "next BOCC meeting?"  Why leave any unaccounted for inventory other than to create the appearance that it is only $29,258.12 if anyone asks questions?  If you are zeroing the books with a massive asset deletion request in July, why not zero the books?

Also, look what else shows up on Page 11, it seems to start a list of unaccounted for equipment from Tech Services, subtotaled at over $15K, apparently continuing onto the next page...not included.  You know Tech Services, the department involved in the most recent inventory scandal.

Let's not forget that as I mention on a previous blog post, Mitch Hedman made a complaint to the State Attorney that he was being asked to resign as a result of trying to expose these discrepancies.  Another question is who would want to put pressure on an employee to resign that was doing the right thing, and why?

For comparison sake, I have probably endured at least four County Inventory audits as the IT Director at the Public Defender's Office and the State Attorney's Office.  Admittedly it's a challenge, with changing staff, laptops and radios, and staff with equipment in the field.  But with the diligence of Mitch Hedman, and his predecessor Mike Miller, every single piece of equipment has been accounted for under my watch.

Why were these issues allowed to exist?  More questions than answers...more questions than answers.




Trimming Back the Tree Commission

Citizen Acknowledges Down's Fight
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 1, 2012
Today's Citizen ran an article about community activist Sandra Down's open challenge to the City of Key West regarding reigning in the City's Tree Commission.  Downs, who has been on a crusade to inform the public of just exactly how the City Tree Commission has been functioning, was recently fined $5,000 for removing a tree for a customer in an emergency situation, with a permit pending as per regulation.

Downs argues that the Tree Commission has become a revenue raising arm of City government that has over stepped it's bounds and authority, and she is calling on City officials to reign them in.  Of note is the fact that public record of the meeting in which Downs was fined has seemingly been deleted or destroyed, adding fuel to the fire.  For detailed coverage of the entire story, blogger Sloan Bashinski has been covering the events in detail at http://goodmorningkeywest.com/.   I would do the entire story injustice if I tried to summarize the detail with which Bashinski has been covering it, I recommend you take a look.

The most glaring truth in today's Key West Citizen's article was this little gem...

Some local landscapers said they agree with Downs' assessments but would not speak for attribution, citing fears of reprisal from city officials.

Folks, when people are afraid of their government to the point that they fear retribution that can affect their livelihood, we have a real problem.  All City Officials should be concerned and consider Down's claims with the utmost of seriousness.  Regardless of the outcome of any appeal, or the validity of any particular fine, when public records get destroyed and the general public fears retribution from the long arm of government...Houston, we have a problem!

I look forward to having Sandy Downs and Sloan Bashinski on the Naked Conch Hour on KONK Friday March 16 at Noon!  Tune in then!

County Inventory Scandal Erupts - How High and How Wide?

Was it the result of a contested election, and a few yet unanswered Public Records Requests?
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  March 1, 2012


I have often written about the benefits of a contested election. Aside from giving the voters a choice, a true contest creates accountability and scrutinizes the manner in which an agency is being run, or the way an incumbent has conducted themselves.


In today's citizen we read about an investigation being launched by the State Attorney into the possibility that County IT equipment was being sold to County staff. Allegations suggest that former Information Services Director Lisa Druckemiller, who retired abruptly on Monday, may have sold iPads and iPhones to staff that included County Administrator Roman Gastesi, Technical Services staff member Hank Kokenzie, and possibly even County Commissioner David Rice.


Really? So aside from the fact that these individuals may have purchased deeply discounted equipment directly from the County Information Services Director without raising an eyebrow, why is it that this is just coming to light now, and who is responsible for the oversight of such equipment?

Oddly enough, just last week on February 22, being a Candidate for County Clerk, I filed a couple of Public Records Requests with County Clerk Danny Kolhage. Some of my interrogatories centered around staff, and salaries, but some were very specific about inventory reports, specifically surrounding the Health Department and the chain of command responsible for inventory. So what prompted Matt Gardi, Candidate for Clerk to ask such questions?


A few days before during lunch I happened upon a gentleman named Mitch Hedman, whom I knew to be involved in County inventory. I was surprised to learn he no longer worked for the Clerk's office, the reason for which was due to the fact he claimed he had been asked to resign after finding a shortfall in inventory of close to $250,000. He mentioned there were serious issues with a few select departments that he brought to the attention of superiors.


I found this shocking, as I always knew him to be extremely diligent, and that clearly the Clerk would respect his analysis. He stated that he also reported it to the Office of the State Attorney, and to the Florida Attorney General, however nothing ever went anywhere with either complaint. He told me he only offered me this information if it would be helpful in my campaign, whereby I might be able to contrast my concern for accountability against that of my opponents. There's that ol' contested election effect again.


I went directly to the Investigator at the State Attorney's Office whom I was told handled the complaint, and sure enough, Hedman had called the SAO in September of 2011. Investigator Chris Weber's notes indicated that Hedman was concerned about being asked to resign for highlighting $250K in missing computers at the Health Department. Weber said he provided Hedman with information about Whistle Blower protection and suggested to Hedman that he put more specific details in writing so that it could be reviewed for a potential investigation. Having never heard back, Weber considered the matter closed.


So, needless to say, both as a citizen, and a Candidate for Clerk I was concerned and wanted to find out more about inventory issues at the Clerk's Office. On February 22nd, I composed those previously mentioned Public Records Requests, and sent them directly to County Clerk Danny Kolhage via email. I also sent a similar request to Robert Eadie, Director of the Monroe County Health Department. To date, I have not been provided a response from either one of them. I have however, been provided information in response to a separate Public Records Request to County Clerk Danny Kolhage that had to do with staff and salaries, a request that I sent AFTER my initial request regarding issues with inventory.


So now, over a week later, with no response to my Public Records Request, according to the Citizen article, County Administrator Roman Gastesi suggests, County staff brought the matter to the attention of the State Attorney's Office on Monday.


What staff, and why now?


I shared my information with State Attorney Dennis Ward, and Chief Investigator Mark Wilson, and while they declined to share any information with me due to the fact it is now an open investigation, I encouraged them to broaden the scope of their investigation.


As the details emerge about the players involved we might gain a better understanding as to why certain things may have been overlooked at the Clerk's Office. Could it be that my Public Records Request hit a little too close to home and shook the tree enough to expose this latest escapade into questionable backroom behavior? While I can't prove that, it does certainly give one pause as I wait for the responses to my unanswered Public Records Requests about other substantial inventory issues.


Either way, this clearly illustrates the benefits of a contested election, the effects in this case having exposed a potential lack of accountability in an office that appears to have been run well for decades....by a revered public official who hasn't had to run in a contested election for years.
_________________________________________
Coming soon to Naked Conch, reasons why another election needs to be contested, the Office of the Public Defender. Any takers?

Gaseous Idea Rises Once Again. County Mulls Gas Tax

- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 23, 2012
Here we go again folks, the move is afoot to raise the gas tax that Monroe County residents pay on each gallon of gasoline they use.  That’s right, in a recent article in the Key West Citizen, Commissioner Kim Wigington broached the subject, suggesting that the issue will come before the Board of County Commissioners in the form of a “more formal” proposal soon.  Awesome, maybe it will be a black tie affair, where Commissioners can hob knob with administrators and discuss more formal ways to nickel and dime us with regressive taxes and fees as an alternative to controlling spending.

Why is it that politicians can only find creative ways to tax us, versus finding creative ways to cut spending, or create efficiencies that save money?  Why?  I’ll tell you why.  Because raising a tax or a fee is easier when you have a captive customer that has no way to escape the tax.  It’s just that simple.  So the challenge is to create a tax or fee that is the least noticed, so that it doesn’t effect one’s popularity come the next election cycle.  Then politicians expect thanks by giving the people back some of their own money in the form of some government service.   

Fortunately, Commissioner George Nuegent was cognizant of the fact that this isn’t the best or brightest idea for revenue raising, and seemed opposed to the idea.  For this, George gets a gold star.  To begin with, the County already collects $.13 on every gallon of gasoline sold in Monroe County, and when you add in State and Federal taxes it crests $.50/gallon in the the State of Florida.  So when you see that number on the sign at the gas station that makes you roll your eyes and scream expletives at foreign nations that hold us hostage with the price of oil, make sure you keep a little reserve tank of frustration for those local bureaucrats that want to tell us how innovative they are by adding to that already painfully high price of gas.

Gas taxes are the most regressive taxes that exist.  This is a tax that the poorest of the poor cannot avoid, especially here in the Keys.  As much as George Nuegent should be admired for his efforts to tune up his bike, tell the single mom with two kids that has to drive to a teacher conference, then downtown to work from Big Coppitt that she just spent an hours wages on gas taxes, and I’m sure she’ll give a nice thanks to Wigington for suggesting this creative new initiative.

Let’s also put this idea of, “It’s awesome ‘cause the tourists are paying for it,” idea to bed.  You know the same argument that was trotted out when the discussion of a US 1 toll was being discussed. First, tourists love to know we here in Monroe County like to stick it to ‘em with gas, bed, and sales taxes, it gives them that nice warm feeling like they want to come back.  Secondly, people travel with a budget, and their wallets only have so much cash in them.  Every penny that you take from a tourist as a tax, is one less penny that is going to go to a Keys business.  You remember businesses, right?  Businesses are those little things that produce things, employ locals, and stir the local economy.  Certainly we should prefer to tax those tourists so local government can find some creative ways to spend that revenue, versus the foolish notion that local businesses are more important.  I mean heck, hopefully soon government can take all our money and be the only business of choice, like...like...Cuba.  That would be cool.

No, a gas tax isn’t a solution.  Nor are any of the simple minded, shallow tax and fee alternatives that hit the poorest segment of our community the hardest.   A solution is to reduce spending elsewhere.  A solution is to create a strong and vibrant local economy so that those taxes that already exist and are levied provide a greater amount of revenue.

Keep your ears open this campaign season, and tune in to whether or not a candidate speaks about efficiency, or if they speak of cute new ways to raise revenue.  Therein lies the truth.  The truth of what motivates a politician, and what defines their persona.  Then cast your vote accordingly.

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - Jake Brady - Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.


Joining me to day, Friday Feb 24 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Jake Brady, Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.
Watch live on Naked Conch
or

New Bank Settlement to be Subsidized by...Yup..the Taxpayers?

No Teeth Settlement Exposed by Financial Times.
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 17, 2012

Leave it to a foreign news source to cover the most pressing issue in the USA.  No need for American news sources to cover the shortcomings of a settlement that relieves global bankers from criminal prosecution for the greatest fraud in world history.

Even for those that thought that the Federal and State regulators' recent settlement with the Big Banks was a step in the right direction, albeit a small one, we now learn that not only have the banks evaded criminal prosecution for destroying the vast majority of our title histories, but in fact, we the taxpayers, will be the ones paying the settlement on the bankers' behalf.

This only continues to confirm that our Federal and State regulators are neutered by the Banks' control and influence, and that it is imperative that we address the infractions and damage done at a local level.

According to the Financial Times, (Along with a great analysis available at ZeroHedge) an "Unannounced Clause Links HAMP payments with the pact."  The article states,

However, a clause in the provisional agreement – which has not been made public – allows the banks to count future loan modifications made under a 2009 foreclosure-prevention initiative towards their restructuring obligations for the new settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. The existing $30bn initiative, the Home Affordable Modification Programme (Hamp), provides taxpayer funds as an incentive to banks, third party investors and troubled borrowers to arrange loan modifications.

Neil Barofsky, a Democrat and the former special inspector-general of the troubled asset relief programme, described this clause as “scandalous”.

“It turns the notion that this is about justice and accountability on its head,” Mr Barofsky said.

BofA, for instance, will be able to use future modifications made under Hamp towards the $7.6bn in borrower assistance it is committed to provide under the settlement. Under Hamp, the bank will receive payments for averting borrower default and reimbursement from taxpayers for principal written down."
Sweet.  Just sweet.

Or better put, as Tyler Durder pens on ZeroHedge.com, "Just to be clear: the guilty party in a fraud against taxpayers has their 'punishment' paid for by the innocent taxpayer who had the crime committed against them? ok, thank you."

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - Tom Peteck, Candidate for Sheriff


Joining me to day, Friday Feb 17 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Tom Peteck, Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.
Watch live on Naked Conch
or

Both State Attorney Candidates Support Some Form of Decriminalization of Marijuana

- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 11, 2012
As the campaign season heats up heading into the 2012 elections, I was surprised to learn that both candidates for State Attorney, incumbant Dennis Ward, and his challenger, former Chief Assistant State Attorney Catherine Vogel support some form of decriminalization of Marijuana.  Catherine Vogel discussed the topic with me live on the air on KONK during a recent appearance on my show, the Naked Conch Hour.  I followed up with Ward off air to get his thoughts regarding the topic, and while being much more guarded, he suggested that he too, might support similar legislation.
To be clear, the concept of decriminalization is by no means “legalization.”  But rather, would take the criminal aspects away from the infraction, while still maintaining a civil penalty.  Proponents of decriminalization argue that there is a tremendous waste of resources that go along with criminal charges being filed against those being caught with small amounts of marijuana.  Factoring into the equation is taking Law Enforcement off the streets to process the arrest, consuming time and resources at the jail, and then the subsequent labor and material costs associated with the State Attorney, Clerk, Courts, and possibly even the Public Defender’s Office.  Proponents suggest that criminal prosecution of those caught with small amounts of marijuana is a costly objective.  They suggest that decriminalization would result in a civil citation being issued, the pot being confiscated, and the individual paying a fine, much like a traffic ticket.  This in turn would generate revenue for all aspects of law enforcement.
 
Opponents argue it creates a slippery slope, and will lead to further acceptance of illegal activity and condones recreational drug use.  They suggest that a relaxed fine, as opposed to criminal prosecution may not create a great enough deterrent to recreational users, thereby increasing the use of marijuana, and aiding the criminal enterprises that exist behind the scenes, producing and distributing pot.  They suggest that a fine simply will become a price to be paid for indulgence.

On my show, when Vogel was presented with the question as a result of the flow of conversation, she was quick to point out that as State Attorney she would always prosecute the laws as they exist, and would not impart her sentiment upon the duties of the office, and the responsibility of prosecuting those currently charged.  However, she expressed her thoughts that from her research jail time does not seem to change the behavior, and agreed that the amount of resources consumed were substantial.  Therefore, she concluded that she would support a legislative approach to decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana.  We didn’t have the opportunity to get into the specifics of what defined small amounts, but Vogel was clear of her support of some sort of decriminalization if developed by the legislature.

State Attorney Ward was much more cautious, requiring specifics such as what defined a small amount before offering an opinion.  He was however quick to offer his full support for the medical use of marijuana, but a little more guarded when it came to possession.  He argued that juveniles already have a way to avoid criminal charges, and thought that age should also play a factor in consideration of any such legislation.  He wouldn't disagree that there was a huge consumption of resources that went along with a criminal prosecution, even in the event of a juvenile that may avoid a criminal record but whose case was still managed by the system.  Ward did eventually capitulate that there may be some instances that it would make sense simply to cite someone with a civil infraction and collect a fine, versus consume all the resources to criminally prosecute.  However, he was clear that he would only support such legislation if small was in fact “very small,” and that he would still have to evaluate such a change on all aspects of the legislation developed.

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - 49 State Settlement with Banks

Joining me to day, Friday Feb 10 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Rick Boettger, fellow Show host, and columnist for Konk Life to discuss the recent 49 State Attorney Generals settlement with the banks regarding their foreclosure practices.  Where are the handcuffs?



Watch live on Naked Conch
or

Park Held Hostage Against It's Will

AKA - Government at it's best!
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 3, 2012

A little known public park on Lower Sugarloaf has been held against it's will unable to serve the public as it would like to for approximately the last two years.  In what can only be hoisted as a disturbing pennant of the proverbial "I'm from the Government, I'm here to help," this little gem of the Keys has been commandeered and cut off from public access... at the public's expense of course.  Worse than that, with it's care under the watchful eyes of Government, this prime piece of Real Estate has also been removed from the tax rolls.

Now granted, it is my understanding that this gem was gifted to the State, and I am in the process of finding out more details, but what used to be a slightly overgrown lot, with an old house on it a few years ago, used by locals to watch the sunrise, fish from, and maybe drop a kayak from, has become a pristine park...logically fenced off from use by the public.

I understand budget constraints, but somehow the State was able to spend money to rebuild the seawall and boat ramp, construct the kiosks, level the ground, spread gravel and landscape this pristine piece of paradise. (Let's not get into the fact there was probably a nice contract that was awarded to perform these enhancements.)  Yet, ultimately they also spent money to build the large gate at it's entrance, and adorn it with the big ol' lock that secures it from the nasty public, hell bent on entering... and dare I say "enjoying"...this public asset.

So perhaps with budget constraints, our Government can not afford to maintain or insure what they have built and that is the reason this parcel needs to be shut off from public access.  It's ironic, because we often hear the rhetoric of how the wealthy have bought up all the water access and restricted open access, but yet here we have an example of our very own government doing exactly the same thing.  AT OUR EXPENSE!

Surely we could not trust the public to properly use open land without the amenities of State provided conveniences.  Even though the public is doing that exact thing from adjacent property, across the channel, and from the nearby bridge.  Surely if the lot was a gift, the State could not risk simply leaving it as natural open land, but instead needed to groom it like a Disney World attraction so that it would be nice to look at from outside the locked gate!

Folks, people say that I'm "radical or extreme" for my suggestion that all levels of government can reduce their budgets by 25% without missing a beat.  This is a perfect example of what I am referring to, and it is what the State has done with this property that should be more appropriately dubbed "radical or extreme."  Furthermore, I suggest that those reductions can occur, AND the level of service can be increased.

However, if we keep listening to high paid government bureaucrats suggesting that they have "cut to the bone," we will be left with more Parks like this to enjoy.



McPherson Files for Saunder's House Seat

Saunders Expected to Run for State Senate
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Jan 31, 2012

So there you have it.  Former Key West Mayor Morgan McPherson has once again filed to run for Florida House District 120 as a Republican, for a seat currently held by Representative Ron Saunders, a Democrat.  This year it looks like Saunders is expected to run for State Senate.

For those of you that don't recall, McPherson also ran in 2010.  As the hand picked candidate of then Florida Speaker of the House Dean Cannon, McPherson was knighted as the supposed party pick to take on Saunders.  Oddly, one local Keys Republican took a little exception to the fact that our District Republican Candidate was hand picked by northern Floridian party officials and stuck his neck out to take on McPherson. That local candidate was...none other than myself.  For highlights, you can review my 2010 campaign website here.

I was naive to think that the race would be fair.  Who woulda thunk that the Republican Party of Florida would donate to a Republican candidate in a contested Republican primary?  But donate they did, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars, along with full time staff and associated donations from PACS that received funding from the RPOF.  In the end, little ol' Matt Gardi was out spent by my estimation 20 to 1, by money that was primarily from upstate.  Click here for one analysis of our contributors.

In the end I lost, but proudly I took 45% of the vote spending roughly $7,000 to McPherson's $150,000, winning most precincts from Key West to Marathon, only being bested by great margins in Dade County.

My primary concern was that locally, we Keys Republicans could field a better candidate to take on Ron Saunders.  It was an atrocity that any State party get involved in anyway before a primary.  The choice of whom Keys Republicans choose as a candidate should be decided by local Keys Republicans, and not State party officials long before a filing deadline.

Let's hope we don't have the same scenario evolve again.  Should RPOF officials get involved early and anoint McPherson with support and financing, it could discourage other potential candidates from filing.  That doesn't give local Keys Republicans a choice in determining whom they feel would be best to represent them in a potentially VERY winnable contest should Saunders choose to run for Senate.

I've been asked if I would run again, and to be honest the challenge of overcoming the potential differential in financing is daunting.  To that end, I call on local Republican leaders to speak out NOW and call off any premature donations from the RPOF to ensure that all qualified candidates feel welcome to the race.

But I haven't ruled out a run for House District 120, nor should others who may be considering a run for a seat where there may be no incumbent.  However, I must admit, I am a little distracted analyzing a similar race without an incumbent...one that I feel is vital to our local community as well... that of Monroe County Clerk.  

Krutko - Round Two!

Robert Krutko joins us once again for the first half of the show, tomorrow, Friday, February 3 at Noon.  Last week we heard his arguments for his lawsuit against the City of Key West.  The audio of that show is still available, here on Naked Conch.  This week we let Robert tell us how he got into legal hot water.  Was it his actions, or was it a conspiracy of government officials and local business people working to silence him?  Let's find out.

Watch live on Naked Conch
or