Gaseous Idea Rises Once Again. County Mulls Gas Tax

- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 23, 2012
Here we go again folks, the move is afoot to raise the gas tax that Monroe County residents pay on each gallon of gasoline they use.  That’s right, in a recent article in the Key West Citizen, Commissioner Kim Wigington broached the subject, suggesting that the issue will come before the Board of County Commissioners in the form of a “more formal” proposal soon.  Awesome, maybe it will be a black tie affair, where Commissioners can hob knob with administrators and discuss more formal ways to nickel and dime us with regressive taxes and fees as an alternative to controlling spending.

Why is it that politicians can only find creative ways to tax us, versus finding creative ways to cut spending, or create efficiencies that save money?  Why?  I’ll tell you why.  Because raising a tax or a fee is easier when you have a captive customer that has no way to escape the tax.  It’s just that simple.  So the challenge is to create a tax or fee that is the least noticed, so that it doesn’t effect one’s popularity come the next election cycle.  Then politicians expect thanks by giving the people back some of their own money in the form of some government service.   

Fortunately, Commissioner George Nuegent was cognizant of the fact that this isn’t the best or brightest idea for revenue raising, and seemed opposed to the idea.  For this, George gets a gold star.  To begin with, the County already collects $.13 on every gallon of gasoline sold in Monroe County, and when you add in State and Federal taxes it crests $.50/gallon in the the State of Florida.  So when you see that number on the sign at the gas station that makes you roll your eyes and scream expletives at foreign nations that hold us hostage with the price of oil, make sure you keep a little reserve tank of frustration for those local bureaucrats that want to tell us how innovative they are by adding to that already painfully high price of gas.

Gas taxes are the most regressive taxes that exist.  This is a tax that the poorest of the poor cannot avoid, especially here in the Keys.  As much as George Nuegent should be admired for his efforts to tune up his bike, tell the single mom with two kids that has to drive to a teacher conference, then downtown to work from Big Coppitt that she just spent an hours wages on gas taxes, and I’m sure she’ll give a nice thanks to Wigington for suggesting this creative new initiative.

Let’s also put this idea of, “It’s awesome ‘cause the tourists are paying for it,” idea to bed.  You know the same argument that was trotted out when the discussion of a US 1 toll was being discussed. First, tourists love to know we here in Monroe County like to stick it to ‘em with gas, bed, and sales taxes, it gives them that nice warm feeling like they want to come back.  Secondly, people travel with a budget, and their wallets only have so much cash in them.  Every penny that you take from a tourist as a tax, is one less penny that is going to go to a Keys business.  You remember businesses, right?  Businesses are those little things that produce things, employ locals, and stir the local economy.  Certainly we should prefer to tax those tourists so local government can find some creative ways to spend that revenue, versus the foolish notion that local businesses are more important.  I mean heck, hopefully soon government can take all our money and be the only business of choice, like...like...Cuba.  That would be cool.

No, a gas tax isn’t a solution.  Nor are any of the simple minded, shallow tax and fee alternatives that hit the poorest segment of our community the hardest.   A solution is to reduce spending elsewhere.  A solution is to create a strong and vibrant local economy so that those taxes that already exist and are levied provide a greater amount of revenue.

Keep your ears open this campaign season, and tune in to whether or not a candidate speaks about efficiency, or if they speak of cute new ways to raise revenue.  Therein lies the truth.  The truth of what motivates a politician, and what defines their persona.  Then cast your vote accordingly.

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - Jake Brady - Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.


Joining me to day, Friday Feb 24 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Jake Brady, Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.
Watch live on Naked Conch
or

New Bank Settlement to be Subsidized by...Yup..the Taxpayers?

No Teeth Settlement Exposed by Financial Times.
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 17, 2012

Leave it to a foreign news source to cover the most pressing issue in the USA.  No need for American news sources to cover the shortcomings of a settlement that relieves global bankers from criminal prosecution for the greatest fraud in world history.

Even for those that thought that the Federal and State regulators' recent settlement with the Big Banks was a step in the right direction, albeit a small one, we now learn that not only have the banks evaded criminal prosecution for destroying the vast majority of our title histories, but in fact, we the taxpayers, will be the ones paying the settlement on the bankers' behalf.

This only continues to confirm that our Federal and State regulators are neutered by the Banks' control and influence, and that it is imperative that we address the infractions and damage done at a local level.

According to the Financial Times, (Along with a great analysis available at ZeroHedge) an "Unannounced Clause Links HAMP payments with the pact."  The article states,

However, a clause in the provisional agreement – which has not been made public – allows the banks to count future loan modifications made under a 2009 foreclosure-prevention initiative towards their restructuring obligations for the new settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. The existing $30bn initiative, the Home Affordable Modification Programme (Hamp), provides taxpayer funds as an incentive to banks, third party investors and troubled borrowers to arrange loan modifications.

Neil Barofsky, a Democrat and the former special inspector-general of the troubled asset relief programme, described this clause as “scandalous”.

“It turns the notion that this is about justice and accountability on its head,” Mr Barofsky said.

BofA, for instance, will be able to use future modifications made under Hamp towards the $7.6bn in borrower assistance it is committed to provide under the settlement. Under Hamp, the bank will receive payments for averting borrower default and reimbursement from taxpayers for principal written down."
Sweet.  Just sweet.

Or better put, as Tyler Durder pens on ZeroHedge.com, "Just to be clear: the guilty party in a fraud against taxpayers has their 'punishment' paid for by the innocent taxpayer who had the crime committed against them? ok, thank you."

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - Tom Peteck, Candidate for Sheriff


Joining me to day, Friday Feb 17 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Tom Peteck, Candidate for Monroe County Sheriff.
Watch live on Naked Conch
or

Both State Attorney Candidates Support Some Form of Decriminalization of Marijuana

- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 11, 2012
As the campaign season heats up heading into the 2012 elections, I was surprised to learn that both candidates for State Attorney, incumbant Dennis Ward, and his challenger, former Chief Assistant State Attorney Catherine Vogel support some form of decriminalization of Marijuana.  Catherine Vogel discussed the topic with me live on the air on KONK during a recent appearance on my show, the Naked Conch Hour.  I followed up with Ward off air to get his thoughts regarding the topic, and while being much more guarded, he suggested that he too, might support similar legislation.
To be clear, the concept of decriminalization is by no means “legalization.”  But rather, would take the criminal aspects away from the infraction, while still maintaining a civil penalty.  Proponents of decriminalization argue that there is a tremendous waste of resources that go along with criminal charges being filed against those being caught with small amounts of marijuana.  Factoring into the equation is taking Law Enforcement off the streets to process the arrest, consuming time and resources at the jail, and then the subsequent labor and material costs associated with the State Attorney, Clerk, Courts, and possibly even the Public Defender’s Office.  Proponents suggest that criminal prosecution of those caught with small amounts of marijuana is a costly objective.  They suggest that decriminalization would result in a civil citation being issued, the pot being confiscated, and the individual paying a fine, much like a traffic ticket.  This in turn would generate revenue for all aspects of law enforcement.
 
Opponents argue it creates a slippery slope, and will lead to further acceptance of illegal activity and condones recreational drug use.  They suggest that a relaxed fine, as opposed to criminal prosecution may not create a great enough deterrent to recreational users, thereby increasing the use of marijuana, and aiding the criminal enterprises that exist behind the scenes, producing and distributing pot.  They suggest that a fine simply will become a price to be paid for indulgence.

On my show, when Vogel was presented with the question as a result of the flow of conversation, she was quick to point out that as State Attorney she would always prosecute the laws as they exist, and would not impart her sentiment upon the duties of the office, and the responsibility of prosecuting those currently charged.  However, she expressed her thoughts that from her research jail time does not seem to change the behavior, and agreed that the amount of resources consumed were substantial.  Therefore, she concluded that she would support a legislative approach to decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana.  We didn’t have the opportunity to get into the specifics of what defined small amounts, but Vogel was clear of her support of some sort of decriminalization if developed by the legislature.

State Attorney Ward was much more cautious, requiring specifics such as what defined a small amount before offering an opinion.  He was however quick to offer his full support for the medical use of marijuana, but a little more guarded when it came to possession.  He argued that juveniles already have a way to avoid criminal charges, and thought that age should also play a factor in consideration of any such legislation.  He wouldn't disagree that there was a huge consumption of resources that went along with a criminal prosecution, even in the event of a juvenile that may avoid a criminal record but whose case was still managed by the system.  Ward did eventually capitulate that there may be some instances that it would make sense simply to cite someone with a civil infraction and collect a fine, versus consume all the resources to criminally prosecute.  However, he was clear that he would only support such legislation if small was in fact “very small,” and that he would still have to evaluate such a change on all aspects of the legislation developed.

Today on the Naked Conch Hour - 49 State Settlement with Banks

Joining me to day, Friday Feb 10 at Noon on the Naked Conch Hour is Rick Boettger, fellow Show host, and columnist for Konk Life to discuss the recent 49 State Attorney Generals settlement with the banks regarding their foreclosure practices.  Where are the handcuffs?



Watch live on Naked Conch
or

Park Held Hostage Against It's Will

AKA - Government at it's best!
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Feb 3, 2012

A little known public park on Lower Sugarloaf has been held against it's will unable to serve the public as it would like to for approximately the last two years.  In what can only be hoisted as a disturbing pennant of the proverbial "I'm from the Government, I'm here to help," this little gem of the Keys has been commandeered and cut off from public access... at the public's expense of course.  Worse than that, with it's care under the watchful eyes of Government, this prime piece of Real Estate has also been removed from the tax rolls.

Now granted, it is my understanding that this gem was gifted to the State, and I am in the process of finding out more details, but what used to be a slightly overgrown lot, with an old house on it a few years ago, used by locals to watch the sunrise, fish from, and maybe drop a kayak from, has become a pristine park...logically fenced off from use by the public.

I understand budget constraints, but somehow the State was able to spend money to rebuild the seawall and boat ramp, construct the kiosks, level the ground, spread gravel and landscape this pristine piece of paradise. (Let's not get into the fact there was probably a nice contract that was awarded to perform these enhancements.)  Yet, ultimately they also spent money to build the large gate at it's entrance, and adorn it with the big ol' lock that secures it from the nasty public, hell bent on entering... and dare I say "enjoying"...this public asset.

So perhaps with budget constraints, our Government can not afford to maintain or insure what they have built and that is the reason this parcel needs to be shut off from public access.  It's ironic, because we often hear the rhetoric of how the wealthy have bought up all the water access and restricted open access, but yet here we have an example of our very own government doing exactly the same thing.  AT OUR EXPENSE!

Surely we could not trust the public to properly use open land without the amenities of State provided conveniences.  Even though the public is doing that exact thing from adjacent property, across the channel, and from the nearby bridge.  Surely if the lot was a gift, the State could not risk simply leaving it as natural open land, but instead needed to groom it like a Disney World attraction so that it would be nice to look at from outside the locked gate!

Folks, people say that I'm "radical or extreme" for my suggestion that all levels of government can reduce their budgets by 25% without missing a beat.  This is a perfect example of what I am referring to, and it is what the State has done with this property that should be more appropriately dubbed "radical or extreme."  Furthermore, I suggest that those reductions can occur, AND the level of service can be increased.

However, if we keep listening to high paid government bureaucrats suggesting that they have "cut to the bone," we will be left with more Parks like this to enjoy.



McPherson Files for Saunder's House Seat

Saunders Expected to Run for State Senate
- Naked Conch - Posted by Matt Gardi -  Jan 31, 2012

So there you have it.  Former Key West Mayor Morgan McPherson has once again filed to run for Florida House District 120 as a Republican, for a seat currently held by Representative Ron Saunders, a Democrat.  This year it looks like Saunders is expected to run for State Senate.

For those of you that don't recall, McPherson also ran in 2010.  As the hand picked candidate of then Florida Speaker of the House Dean Cannon, McPherson was knighted as the supposed party pick to take on Saunders.  Oddly, one local Keys Republican took a little exception to the fact that our District Republican Candidate was hand picked by northern Floridian party officials and stuck his neck out to take on McPherson. That local candidate was...none other than myself.  For highlights, you can review my 2010 campaign website here.

I was naive to think that the race would be fair.  Who woulda thunk that the Republican Party of Florida would donate to a Republican candidate in a contested Republican primary?  But donate they did, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars, along with full time staff and associated donations from PACS that received funding from the RPOF.  In the end, little ol' Matt Gardi was out spent by my estimation 20 to 1, by money that was primarily from upstate.  Click here for one analysis of our contributors.

In the end I lost, but proudly I took 45% of the vote spending roughly $7,000 to McPherson's $150,000, winning most precincts from Key West to Marathon, only being bested by great margins in Dade County.

My primary concern was that locally, we Keys Republicans could field a better candidate to take on Ron Saunders.  It was an atrocity that any State party get involved in anyway before a primary.  The choice of whom Keys Republicans choose as a candidate should be decided by local Keys Republicans, and not State party officials long before a filing deadline.

Let's hope we don't have the same scenario evolve again.  Should RPOF officials get involved early and anoint McPherson with support and financing, it could discourage other potential candidates from filing.  That doesn't give local Keys Republicans a choice in determining whom they feel would be best to represent them in a potentially VERY winnable contest should Saunders choose to run for Senate.

I've been asked if I would run again, and to be honest the challenge of overcoming the potential differential in financing is daunting.  To that end, I call on local Republican leaders to speak out NOW and call off any premature donations from the RPOF to ensure that all qualified candidates feel welcome to the race.

But I haven't ruled out a run for House District 120, nor should others who may be considering a run for a seat where there may be no incumbent.  However, I must admit, I am a little distracted analyzing a similar race without an incumbent...one that I feel is vital to our local community as well... that of Monroe County Clerk.  

Krutko - Round Two!

Robert Krutko joins us once again for the first half of the show, tomorrow, Friday, February 3 at Noon.  Last week we heard his arguments for his lawsuit against the City of Key West.  The audio of that show is still available, here on Naked Conch.  This week we let Robert tell us how he got into legal hot water.  Was it his actions, or was it a conspiracy of government officials and local business people working to silence him?  Let's find out.

Watch live on Naked Conch
or